Webhard
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud must be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.
Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.
Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only needs to be in a folder.
You will need to share a URL and that means you can’t share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It’s a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It’s far better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it’s often take off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it’s about once every two hours. And when you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it’s in that state, you should discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.
If you don’t upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn’t bother me.
There are the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It’s a bit of a problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it’s not stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)
Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world in terms of media reading.
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It’s a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn’t work with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It’s practically infinite unless you’re going to share large files.
The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards…
There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.
The p2p 순위 itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is quite disadvantageous. It’s even worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s easier to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
If you don’t install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it’s less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there’s also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn’t that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.